giovedì 9 settembre 2010

L'ordigno fine del mondo è di nuovo tra noi!

Qualche mese fa alfaobeta vi ha raccontato come una tempesta solare intensa (ma non peggio di quanto si verifichi almeno una volta al secolo) possa provocare uno scenario fine del mondo (finanziario, ma non solo...). Il timore è appunto che gli intensi campi elttromagnetici associati a una tempesta solare possano inteferire con le comunicazioni e mettere in ginocchio l'intero sistema finanziario mondiale fondato sulle transazioni di moneta elettronica. 
Secondo gli analisti di Stratfor però si può ottenere lo stesso tipo di distruzione mediante un'esplosione nucleare di alta quota, secondo uno scenario ben noto e studiato durante i lunghi anni della guerra fredda.

In order to have the best chance of causing the type of immediate and certain EMP (=electromagnetic pulse) damage to the United States on a continent-wide scale, as discussed in many media reports, a nuclear weapon (probably in the megaton range) would need to be detonated well above 30 kilometers somewhere over the American Midwest. Modern commercial aircraft cruise at a third of this altitude. Only the United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia and China possess both the mature warhead design and intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capability to conduct such an attack from their own territory, and these same countries have possessed that capability for decades. (Shorter range missiles can achieve this altitude, but the center of the United States is still 1,000 kilometers from the Eastern Seaboard and more than 3,000 kilometers from the Western Seaboard — so just any old Scud missile won’t do.)

 C'è allora chi teme che alla tempesta solare si possa sostituire qualche terrorista o qualche stato senza scrupoli: 

One scenario that has been widely put forth is that the EMP threat emanates not from a global or regional power like Russia or China but from a rogue state or a transnational terrorist group that does not possess ICBMs but will use subterfuge to accomplish its mission without leaving any fingerprints. In this scenario, the rogue state or terrorist group loads a nuclear warhead and missile launcher aboard a cargo ship or tanker and then launches the missile from just off the coast in order to get the warhead into position over the target for a HEMP strike. This scenario would involve either a short-range ballistic missile to achieve a localized metropolitan strike or a longer-range (but not intercontinental) ballistic missile to reach the necessary position over the Eastern or Western seaboard or the Midwest to achieve a key coastline or continental strike.

Secondo gli analisti di Stratfor le probabilità di un attacco di questo tipo, da parte di terroristi o di stati canaglia sono limitate ma non possono essere completamente ignorate:  

But even if a terrorist organization were somehow able to obtain a functional warhead and compatible fissile core, the challenges of mating the warhead to a missile it was not designed for and then getting it to launch and detonate properly would be far more daunting than it would appear at first glance. Additionally, the process of fueling a liquid-fueled ballistic missile at sea and then launching it from a ship using an improvised launcher would also be very challenging. (North Korea, Iran and Pakistan all rely heavily on Scud technology, which uses volatile, corrosive and toxic fuels.)
Such a scenario is challenging enough, even before the uncertainty of achieving the desired HEMP effect is taken into account. This is just the kind of complexity and uncertainty that well-trained terrorist operatives seek to avoid in an operation. Besides, a ground-level nuclear detonation in a city such as New York or Washington would be more likely to cause the type of terror, death and physical destruction that is sought in a terrorist attack than could be achieved by generally non-lethal EMP.
Make no mistake: EMP is real. Modern civilization depends heavily on electronics and the electrical grid for a wide range of vital functions, and this is truer in the United States than in most other countries. Because of this, a HEMP attack or a substantial geomagnetic storm could have a dramatic impact on modern life in the affected area. However, as we’ve discussed, the EMP threat has been around for more than half a century and there are a number of technical and practical variables that make a HEMP attack using a nuclear warhead highly unlikely.

A questo punto abbiamo scoperchiato il vaso di Pandora, pieno di cigni grigi, certamente non neri, ma non per questo meno terrificanti: 

When considering the EMP threat, it is important to recognize that it exists amid a myriad other threats, including related threats such as nuclear warfare and targeted, small-scale HPM attacks. They also include threats posed by conventional warfare and conventional weapons such as man-portable air-defense systems, terrorism, cyberwarfare attacks against critical infrastructure, chemical and biological attacks — even natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods and tsunamis.
The world is a dangerous place, full of potential threats. Some things are more likely to occur than others, and there is only a limited amount of funding to monitor, harden against, and try to prevent, prepare for and manage them all. When one attempts to defend against everything, the practical result is that one defends against nothing. Clear-sighted, well-grounded and rational prioritization of threats is essential to the effective defense of the homeland.
Hardening national infrastructure against EMP and HPM is undoubtedly important, and there are very real weaknesses and critical vulnerabilities in America’s critical infrastructure — not to mention civil society. But each dollar spent on these efforts must be balanced against a dollar not spent on, for example, port security, which we believe is a far more likely and far more consequential vector for nuclear attack by a rogue state or non-state actor.

Lieto di avervi accompagnato in questo breve viaggio indietro nel tempo ma avanti nell'orrore non posso che concludere questo post con l'indimenticabile scena in cui i russi svelano di aver costruito l'ordigno fine di mondo, dal Dr. Stranamore di Stanley Kubrick: 

Nessun commento: