lunedì 31 gennaio 2011

I portafogli dei guru: Benjamin Graham

Sul sito del Nasdaq è possibile utilizzare uno stock screener quantitativo che seleziona quei titoli quotati sui mercati USA (AMEX, NASDAQ, NYSE e OTC) che verificano dei criteri di selezione conformi a popolari semplici strategie di investimento quantitative:
Dal luglio del 2003 Validea.com ha costruito dei portafogli ribilanciati mensilmente costituiti da 10 azioni
che soddisfano i criteri di selezione dei diversi "guru".

Rebalancing Period: Filter our model portfolios using the drop down boxes to the left. You can filter based on the number of stocks in the portfolio, the rebalancing time frame, and the period over which the return is calculated.
Portfolio Size:
Return Period:
Investing Style:
Model Portfolio Based on
Book By/About
Date of Inception Annualized Return S&P 500 Return Accuracy Beta
Value Investor Benjamin Graham 7/15/2003 16.4% 3.3% 57.3% 1.20
Small-Cap Growth Investor Motley Fool 7/15/2003 15.0% 3.3% 51.1% 1.10
Price/Sales Investor Kenneth Fisher 7/15/2003 13.5% 3.3% 60.1% 1.21
Earnings Yield Investor Joel Greenblatt 12/2/2005 10.4% 0.2% 50.6% 1.02
P/E/Growth Investor Peter Lynch 7/15/2003 9.7% 3.3% 58.7% 1.14
Growth/Value Investor James P. O'Shaughnessy 7/15/2003 9.2% 3.3% 53.4% 0.99
Contrarian Investor David Dreman 7/15/2003 9.1% 3.3% 60.2% 1.24
Book/Market Investor Joseph Piotroski 2/27/2004 9.0% 1.6% 60.9% 1.36
Growth Investor Martin Zweig 7/15/2003 8.4% 3.3% 56.5% 1.06
Low PE Investor John Neff 1/2/2004 3.7% 2.0% 54.3% 1.17
Patient Investor Warren Buffett 12/5/2003 3.7% 2.6% 55.7% 1.06
Momentum Investor Validea 7/15/2003 3.3% 3.3% 43.5% 0.98

Nel complesso la maggior parte di questi portafogli se l'è cavata piuttosto bene (se non si tiene conto dei costi di transazione e dei problemi di impatto degli ordini e di liquidità dei titoli selezionati). Il migliore è costruito selezionando i titoli secondo i criteri del value investing descritti da Benjamin Graham nel suo classico The Intelligent Investor (qui sotto potete leggerne un estratto, grazie a scribd.com, io l'ho comprato su Amazon, lo sto leggendo in questi giorni e lo raccomando caldamente):

Widely recognized as the father of securities analysis, Benjamin Graham argued for investing in stocks that were significantly undervalued relative to their intrinsic worth, which he measured principally by their future earnings potential. Defensive investors who followed his advice, he said, would enjoy an invaluable "margin of safety" in their investment activities. In his classic book The Intelligent Investor, Graham recommended buying stocks of large, prominent and conservatively financed companies with a long record of continuous dividend payments. He warned against stocks with price-to-earnings ratios of more than 25 times trailing seven-year average annual earnings, or more than 20 times their prior 12-months results. (He did that even though he knew it meant excluding growth stocks.) A true bargain, Graham insisted, was a company whose real value was at least 50% more than its stock price.

Graham's methodology is appropriate for conservative investors worried about the high valuations currently accorded to many stocks, but unwilling to settle for investing only in cash or bonds.


Benjamin Graham-The Intelligent Investor 2003 Revised Ed

Il 31 dicembre scorso ho costruito un portafoglio virtuale del valore di 10000 dollari USA selezionando i 9 titoli che utilizzando lo screener verificavano al 100% i criteri richiesti da Graham:

ATW, ELP, CW, ESV, HGVLY, LPH, SNY, CKH, SUHJY



Ecco il rendimento nel mese di gennaio 2011 confrontato con quello dell'indice S&P500
Current Value 10,330.29
Total Gain/Loss +3.21%
Jan 31 2011 17:46 GMT. Quotes are delayed by at least 20 minutes.




Qui sotto potete vedere il risultato dello screening effettuato sui valori di chiusura di venerdì scorso

Guru Stock Screener Report
Value Investor Either Interest Level
Based on our analysis of the book by Benjamin Graham
Click on any header to sort by that variable.
Symbol Company All
Interest
Strong
/Some
This
Guru's
Quant
Score
Previous
Close
Mkt Value
$(Mil)
Rel.
Strength
P/E P/E/G Proj
P/E
12
mo.
 SNY   SANOFI-AVENTIS SA (ADR)  3 / 0    100% 33.35   88,562   28   10   0.6   8
 LPH   LONGWEI PETROLEUM INVESTMENT HOLD LTD  2 / 1    100% 2.55   256   40   10   0.4   5
 ATW   ATWOOD OCEANICS, INC.  2 / 1    100% 39.22   2,536   51   10   0.3   10
 BNGPY   BENETTON GROUP SPA (ADR)  2 / 0    100% 14.20   1,301   7   1.8  
 ESV   ENSCO PLC  2 / 0    100% 54.04   7,725   70   13   0.4   15
 ELP   COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA (ADR)  2 / 0    100% 25.33   6,712   60   14   0.7   8
 CKH   SEACOR HOLDINGS, INC.  2 / 0    100% 106.01   2,252   79   9   0.8   9
 HGVLY   EVRAZ HIGHVELD STEEL & VANDIUM LTD (ADR)  1 / 0    100% 11.83   1,287  
 ARO   AEROPOSTALE, INC.  3 / 2    86% 24.34   2,141   45   10   0.3   10
 CVX   CHEVRON CORPORATION  1 / 3    86% 93.37   187,900   64   10   1.9   9
 XIN   XINYUAN REAL ESTATE CO., LTD. (ADR)  0 / 4    86% 2.41   183   14   3   0.2   4
 RINO   RINO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION  2 / 1    86% 2.78   62   3   1   0.0   2
 JNJ   JOHNSON & JOHNSON  2 / 1    86% 60.01   164,803   30   12   1.6   12
 GRMN   GARMIN LTD.  2 / 1    86% 30.81   5,960   31   8   0.4  
 BKR   MICHAEL BAKER CORPORATION  1 / 2    86% 30.42   281   21   13   0.4   13
 SENEB   SENECA FOODS CORPORATION  1 / 2    86% 23.12   290   25   11   0.4   17
 RSH   RADIOSHACK CORPORATION  1 / 2    86% 15.20   1,730   21   9   0.7   9
 VSEC   VSE CORPORATION  1 / 2    86% 29.93   155   14   6   0.2   7
 DCM   NTT DOCOMO, INC. (ADR)  1 / 2    86% 17.72   77,424   55   12   13
 FUQI   FUQI INTERNATIONAL, INC.  1 / 2    86% 5.04   139   6   2   0.1   3

Aggiornerò quindi il portafoglio con i valori di chiusura di questa sera, vendendo i titoli corrispondenti ai ticker CW che non verifica più il criterio relativo al rapporto P/E inferiore a 15 (ho riportato in fondo al post l'analisi dettagliata del titolo) e SUHJY (che pure supera di poco il limite sul rapporto P/E) e aggiungerò al portafoglio, ribilanciandolo, il titolo mancante....BNGPY....Benetton Group SPA (BNGPY) (!). Appuntamento al 28 febbraio per vedere com'è andata.


CW: Guru Score: 86%


SECTOR: [PASS]
CW is neither a technology nor financial Company, and therefore this methodology is applicable.


SALES: [PASS]
The investor must select companies of "adequate size". This includes companies with annual sales greater than $340 million. CW's sales of $1,872.5 million, based on trailing 12 month sales, pass this test.


CURRENT RATIO: [PASS]
The current ratio must be greater than or equal to 2. Companies that meet this criterion are typically financially secure and defensive. CW's current ratio of 2.35 passes the test.


LONG-TERM DEBT IN RELATION TO NET CURRENT ASSETS: [PASS]
For industrial companies, long-term debt must not exceed net current assets (current assets minus current liabilities). Companies that meet this criterion display one of the attributes of a financially secure organization. The long-term debt for CW is $524.1 million, while the net current assets are $543.1 million. CW passes this test.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH: [PASS]
Companies must increase their EPS by at least 30% over a ten-year period and EPS must not have been negative for any year within the last 5 years. Companies with this type of growth tend to be financially secure and have proven themselves over time. CW's EPS growth over that period of 94.0% passes the EPS growth test.


P/E RATIO: [FAIL]
The Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio, based on the greater of the current PE or the PE using average earnings over the last 3 fiscal years, must be "moderate", which this methodology states is not greater than 15. Stocks with moderate P/Es are more defensive by nature. CW's P/E of 15.34 (using the current PE) fails this test.


PRICE/BOOK RATIO: [PASS]
The Price/Book ratio must also be reasonable. That is, the Price/Book multiplied by P/E cannot be greater than 22. CW's Price/Book ratio is 1.42, while the P/E is 15.34. CW passes the Price/Book test.

2 commenti:

Anonimo ha detto...

Buongiorno Professore.
Che cosa si intende per "accuracy".
Grazie.
Carlo

Stefano Marmi ha detto...

Credo sia la percentuale di selezioni che hanno prodotto rendimenti positivi ma bisognerebbe controllare nelle FAQ del sito di validea.com