The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Goldman, Sachs & Co. and one of its vice presidents for defrauding investors by misstating and omitting key facts about a financial product tied to subprime mortgages as the U.S. housing market was beginning to falter.
The SEC alleges that Goldman Sachs structured and marketed a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) that hinged on the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). Goldman Sachs failed to disclose to investors vital information about the CDO, in particular the role that a major hedge fund played in the portfolio selection process and the fact that the hedge fund had taken a short position against the CDO.
"The product was new and complex but the deception and conflicts are old and simple," said Robert Khuzami, Director of the Division of Enforcement. "Goldman wrongly permitted a client that was betting against the mortgage market to heavily influence which mortgage securities to include in an investment portfolio, while telling other investors that the securities were selected by an independent, objective third party."
Kenneth Lench, Chief of the SEC's Structured and New Products Unit, added, "The SEC continues to investigate the practices of investment banks and others involved in the securitization of complex financial products tied to the U.S. housing market as it was beginning to show signs of distress."
The SEC alleges that one of the world's largest hedge funds, Paulson & Co., paid Goldman Sachs to structure a transaction in which Paulson & Co. could take short positions against mortgage securities chosen by Paulson & Co. based on a belief that the securities would experience credit events.
According to the SEC's complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the marketing materials for the CDO known as ABACUS 2007-AC1 (ABACUS) all represented that the RMBS portfolio underlying the CDO was selected by ACA Management LLC (ACA), a third party with expertise in analyzing credit risk in RMBS. The SEC alleges that undisclosed in the marketing materials and unbeknownst to investors, the Paulson & Co. hedge fund, which was poised to benefit if the RMBS defaulted, played a significant role in selecting which RMBS should make up the portfolio.
Quanto basta a far perdere quasi il 2% sia al Dow (che riscende sotto 11000) che all'S&P500 (nuovamente sotto 1200), mentre Goldman perde il 12% e sul fronte europeo Deutsche Bank, che è stata coinvolta nella denuncia che fece mesi fa il New York Times sulla faccenda, ha perso il 7%
Qui trovate la notizia su Yahoo Finance (con la foto di Henry Paulson, già CEO di Goldman e segretario del Tesoro USA durante l'amministrazione Bush, ma che non è il Paulson al quale si fa riferimento nell'articolo!! )
Se volete seguire i riflessi della denuncia sull'hedge fund di John Paulson potete usare questo link.
Il New York Times, che aveva denunciato la cosa con un articolo alla fine di dicembre del 2009, ha già un lungo articolo sulla denuncia della S.E.C.. Il testo completo della denuncia della S.E.C lo trovate qui. Se siete interessati ad approfondire l'argomento potete seguire il blog di Yves Smith che certamente dedicherà numerosi post alla vicenda anche in futuro.
Alfaobeta aveva ripreso l'articolo del NYTimes il 27 dicembre scorso con un ulteriore approfondimento il 31 dicembre: i miei lettori possono essere soddisfatti del tempo trascorso su questo blog
(...ma ancora più contenti saranno i lettori che presero sul serio l'analisi del mercato del 7 marzo 2009).
2 commenti:
ormai lei merita il titolo di guru!!!!
si si! Sono pronto a infestarvi di previsioni su qualsiasi asset... ricordate la pizza di fango del Camerun?
Ho appena comprato una sfera di cristallo nuova di zecca...
Posta un commento